User talk:Stecklen/sandbox

First draft review
General comment: Good start in terms of the sections and the sources. If you are struggling with organization of the topic, I would recommend reading de Pater and Lissauer's textbook, "Planetary Science" to see how chapters are structured. In regards to your question about reiteration of other pages, I have run into this challenge too and found that it is effective if your page doesn't just reiterate, but instead elaborate as well.

From rubric

Organization: (1) Heading, The author's heading covers a good breadth of topics relevant to planetary cores

(2) Subheading, The author's use of subheading is effective.

(3) Ordering, The organization for this page is good, but I believe switching (3) Chemistry and (4) Dynamics because the flow from (2) Formation leads naturally to Dynamics. The (5) Observed Type section can be renamed to "Core Example" or "Example"

Content:

(1) Discussion of topics: The text included by you are a good start ("Seismologist use earthquakes...") but I would focus less on the techniques and more on the observation. (2) Citations: The planned citation are reliable but maybe some more reference types (textbooks) may be helpful to both develop content and help organization.

Grammar and Spelling: N/A right now, but can help once more text is added. I will be happy to edit

Grading rubric

Darahok (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Second set of comments were emailed to you Darahok (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)