User talk:Steed Asprey - 171

R&AW secretary
Hi you have been editing the r&aw page especially on the secretary part quite well, your edits were very informative but most of them do not cite any reference, it would be of great help if you can substantiate all the info provided with relevant references. thanks LegalEagle (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response dated 2nd sep 08. Keep up the good work. I got this section back from archive but if you want to remove it please archive it rather than delete. Also recently you added someinteresting information like division between RAS and other cadre and transferability between them, there is an excellent tehelka article on this point. Do check it if possible and also always add citations and references. LegalEagle (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Saruman
Hi. I'm glad to see you're interested in the Saruman page. I'm a bit concerned about the number of quotes that you're adding to the article, and some of the inferences that you're drawing from them. Can I suggest that you read WP:QUOTE and consider whether you are over-using quotes? They should really only be used in moderation when they are the best way to illustrate a point. Some of the ones you have added (in my opinion, of course!) just repeat at length points already made in the text. The run of seven quotes towards the end of 'Characteristics' seem almost random in nature - what is the point you are trying to illustrate here?

You might also want to read WP:OR. When you state that "This shows the respect Gandalf had for Saruman, even after Saruman was defeated." you are offering your own interpretation of what Tolkien wrote. Opinions such as this should always be sourced to a reliable source, even if it seems obvious to you.

I hope this is helpful feedback. Please contact me on my talk page if you want to discuss any of this. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 18:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Introduction of the India page
Yes, if it is true, it should remain. Unless you can prove otherwise. We have to face it buddy :) Nshuks7 (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)