User talk:Steelhead

Images
Hi. On the upload page contributors are asked to provide detailed information on the source of images they upload and the licensing arrangements that allow us to use them. Could you do this for the following images you uploaded please: Image:Babur.jpg, Image:Uzbekgirlmarried.jpg, Image:Hazaraboy.jpg, Image:Kurmanbek Bakiev, President.jpg, Image:Kazakhhunter2.jpg, Image:Kazakhhunter.jpg, Image:Uighurchildren.jpg. You just need to say where they came from and add an image copyright tag. Thanks in advance. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 18:08, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Please also read Copyrights and keep in mind that wikipedia generally allows ofly free, public domain and GFDL-licensed images. Images that have no proof that they are allowed in wikipedia will be deleted. mikka (t) 21:20, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

GFDL-presumed Fairuse

No disputes at all
There are no disputes after the citation from the Shaolin, The Gracies, Tsumi Hoan and Goju Ryu.

It's a fact and the disputes exist in people's head who can't argue it out in the talk room, always shying away from telling why won't they accept the official version ??? why make such a big deal of a game charecter ??? and why fear the still-in-progress-because-I-have-a-life databases of official citations and websites confirming that this school of thought exists and is supported by authorities both of official nature and non official nature. Freedom skies 23:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

If I gave you a hint of hatred towards the British people
Then sorry, I did'nt mean it at all. The fact is what they did to the colonies in general was really disturbing, mind you I'm not talking about the civilians but the occupying forces.

anyways, that's over and if you took a look in my profile you'll see that I support the war on terror, and UK's role in general.

If i gave a hint of racial bias, my apologies, once agan. I assure you I never meant to say anything to that effect. Freedom skies 00:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

3rr
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Cowman109 Talk 01:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Mucking About

 * I request you to not muck about in the Indian Nationalism article and mess it up from a version decided by consensus. If you wish to express anti-India sentiments then get a blog.Netaji 21:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Plus, get your facts straight. It's spelled THAPAR, not THARPA, and she is not in Harvard and never was. Wrong country, even. The article has plenty on Muslim and Sikh national identity also, and so is perfectly balanced and reflects a wide range of beliefs held by the people of India. Everything is cited with references.Netaji 21:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Indian nationalism
The bullets footnoted 1 through 7 as well as 9 and 10 I verified myself. The sources verify the text and those sources are credible.

The sources cited for the "oldest university" claim definitely do not verify the text. As for the rest, frankly, I just can't be bothered, but remember, "any material that is challenged and has no source may be removed by any editor....Attribution is especially needed for...superlatives and absolutes such as statements that something is the best, first or only one of its kind." Or oldest. Regards CiteCop 22:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

I checked as many of the bullets as I could. I was pointing out which were legit and which weren't CiteCop 22:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)