User talk:StefanoBonelli

Welcome!

Hello, StefanoBonelli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Inpatient Safety On Board have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Itemirus (talk)  13:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Inpatient Safety On Board


A tag has been placed on Inpatient Safety On Board, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate at Articles for deletion/Inpatient Safety On Board. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Why the article was deleted
Wikipedia is a project to build an encyclopedia, not a place for people or organizations to post copies of their promotional literature - for background, read User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard.

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about subjects for articles. The inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability, and is not a matter of saying so but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? Many perfectly worthy organizations cannot meet that requirement. That is not at all to their discredit, but it means they are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article.

When this article was first posted it was deleted after a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Inpatient Safety On Board which concluded that it did not meet the notability requirement. It was also felt to be too promotional in tone: Wikipedia articles require a neutral point of view.

Since it has been deleted after discussion, it cannot simply be re-posted. If you want to contest the deletion, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed the deletion discussion; if he does not agree, you can go to WP:Deletion review. Before you embark on that, think hard about notability, because if you cannot show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources you will be wasting your time: an article will not be accepted.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)