User talk:StefanoStefano

Speedy deletion of Stefano Carlson
A tag has been placed on Stefano Carlson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler (talk) 03:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Steven Carlson
Talk:Steven Carlson, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Steven Carlson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Steven Carlson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk ♦  contribs  20:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stefano Vroom
I have nominated Stefano Vroom, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Stefano Vroom. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk ♦  contribs  20:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Stefano Carlson
Talk:Stefano Carlson, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Stefano Carlson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Stefano Carlson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk ♦  contribs  20:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stefano Vroom
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Stefano Vroom, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please do not create hoaxes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks,  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)