User talk:Steffanie.zazulak

Speedy deletion nomination of GlobalEnglish


A tag has been placed on GlobalEnglish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Hello Steffanie.zazulak. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article GlobalEnglish, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''Based upon your edit here it appears you have a conflict of interest. '' ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

GlobalEnglish Page
Hello ConcernedVancouverite,

You are absolutely correct in identifying the conflict of interest I have with this page. I work for GlobalEnglish in their marketing department and we feel strongly about having our brand on Wikipedia so I would like to work with you to get this page where it needs to be WITHOUT sounding like an advertisement.

Wikipedia is the first stop for those searching about specific companies (and given the global reach of our clients and users) we would like to do as much as we can to include as much as we can about the company.

How can I add information back in about the company history and products without it sounding promotional? Also, can I take direct quote from news articles about the business and place them into the article?

I am looking forward to your feedback,

Steffanie Steffanie.zazulak (talk) 18:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your honesty regarding your conflict of interest. Generally it is best to not edit the article and let it develop on its own as the organization reaches the notability standards that would draw other editors to editing it.  ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * ConcernedVancouverite, we meet again--I see now that I looked at this article and pruned it some, back in 2011--and it's still in an awful shape. Ms. Zazulak, this cannot stand; we need to clean this up. BTW, I just blocked for a user name violation. If Racheal Pickens still works for you all, tell her I said hi and I'm good for the next semester. Drmies (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GlobalEnglish


The article GlobalEnglish has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Delete SPA-created; does not come anywhere close to meeting WP:NCORP."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)