User talk:Steguru

Requested move (November 2009)
User:Steguru → ASD Simplified Technical English — New page created by registered user to go live (1st time). --Steguru (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC) Err... Whereabouts is the new page? It's not at User:Steguru. Is it in a sub-page, perhaps? Tevildo (talk) 21:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * User:Steguru/ASD Simplified Technical English 199.125.109.102 (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. We already have an article on this subject at Simplified English - perhaps the best thing for you to do would be to add your new material to the existing article.  If you think the page should be at ASD Simplified Technical English instead, you should, after adding your new material, put the requested move template that was on your talk page originally on the talk page of the existing article - Talk:Simplified English. Tevildo (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I think this needs to be a separate entry, as this is the current name of the official specification. Simplified English on the other hand is a more generic term. 17:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Please release this page now Steguru (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Anyone act on this please? It has been weeks already. Steguru (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Steguru (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Requested move (December 2009)

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was not done. Skomorokh  10:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Steguru → ASD Simplified Technical English — Finally go live. --Steguru (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment that is impossible, it would violate WP:GFDL . has an edit history and was merged with Simplified English. I suggest you just rewrite the redirect into an article, instead of moving your sandbox, since no one has had any contribution to your sandbox... The requested target was merged into Simplified English, and so should keep its edit history. 76.66.194.220 (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose violates WP:GFDL. 76.66.194.220 (talk) 04:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose. My opinion is unchanged since this move was last proposed.  The new material should be added to the Simplified English article, not created as a new article about the same subject.  Tevildo (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - There is already an existing article at simplified english. -- Whpq (talk) 12:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Simplified English do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Simplified English. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.. The added external link promotes commercial activities of a certain company. Please stop re-adding it. Materialscientist (talk) 01:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Simplified English. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tobias Kuhn (talk) 03:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Simplified English, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Tobias Kuhn (talk) 03:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 16:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. NTox · talk 18:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)