User talk:Stella8358

Proposed deletion of Scott Evans (television personality)


The article Scott Evans (television personality) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BASIC with no independent secondary sources, just a WP:NEWSPRIMARY interview that opens "I’ve known Scott Evans since before college..."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Doniago. Your recent edit to the page John Patrick Amedori appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your original edit to his filmography, removing Almost Famous'', appears to have been correct. I'm not sure why you then reinserted this credit, as I can find no evidence that he appears in this film. Thanks!'' DonIago (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Scott Evans (television personality)
Hello, Stella8358,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Scott Evans (television personality) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Scott Evans (television personality).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

menaechmi (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, Stella. I see you added an infobox to Cary Grant, despite the edit notice which appears when you go to edit, and which states "The current consensus for this article is no infobox is necessary. Please discuss any changes specific to this article only in talk page instead." There is also a link to where the consensus was formed. Did you not notice this? In any case, please don't add an infobox to the article again, unless a new consensus is formed on the talkpage. Bishonen &#124; talk 13:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC).

Rayford Griffin moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rayford Griffin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  21:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:ScottEvansNBCAccess.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:ScottEvansNBCAccess.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rayford Griffin


Hello, Stella8358. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rayford Griffin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Stacy Paetz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stacy Paetz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stacy Paetz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC)