User talk:StellaBMe

Welcome!
Hello, StellaBMe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Danielle Keasling, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nupamjo (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danielle Keasling


A tag has been placed on Danielle Keasling, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Nupamjo (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Danielle Keasling
Not sure why you said in your edit summary that you were creating the article in your sandbox, but instead you created it in article space. Please work on improving it there before submitting for review. Please ensure that you read and abide by the guidelines on conflicts of interest. Deb (talk) 08:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for moving the article to draft. This is my first time doing a page; did spend considerable time reviewing how to articles. I see where it's being edited by other wiki editors in draft status. I'm not sure what I need to do. StellaBMe (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... Improving Draft:Danielle Keasling. StellaBMe (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You may not use the help templates for a general request to improve something on Wikipedia. "In need of improvement" is considered to be true of nearly every page on the project and you may not attempt to divert the attention of helpers, who are looking to answer questions about "how to edit", but not diffuse requests like this one.
 * As a draft, this one shares characteristics of many new editor's efforts. It is promotional. It overloads sentences with excessive footnotes. It fails to establish notability via independent reporting about its subject. Interviews of Keasling, writings (or other productions) by Keasling, and public relations efforts like the Lady Gaga article in American Salon are not acceptable for purposes of notability.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Danielle Keasling
Hello, StellaBMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danielle Keasling, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Danielle Keasling


Hello, StellaBMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Danielle Keasling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)