User talk:StepanovVasya

Welcome!
Hello, StepanovVasya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Insider (talk) 06:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Moving articles
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Grasshopper (block cipher) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 09:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

GOST ciphers
Добрый день. Если вы хотите описать шифр из нового ГОСТа, пожалуйста, используйте официальное английское название "Kuznyechik", потому что так предписано в тексте самого стандарта и в RFC. Не используйте буквальный перевод "Grasshopper", потому что он является жаргонизмом. Такое название не используется ни в одном официальном документе. Также текст страницы должен быть написан на читаемом английском, а не в гуглопереводе. К примеру, хорошим (и официальным) анлоязычным описанием Кузнечика является RFC 7801. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheInevitable (talk • contribs) 10:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

оффициально везде Grasshopper скачайте оффициальный документ на английском увидите Grasshopper https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6BlkqAoxXq1LTgzMFFBekRFQWM/view?pref=2&pli=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.71.243.131 (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

(Translation of the comment above into English: Hi. If you want to describe the cipher from the new GOST, please use the official English name "Kuznyechik", because this English name is mandated in the text of the standard and in the RFC. The literal translation "Grasshopper" is a slang name which is not used in any official documents. Also the current page is not comprehensible and looks like a google translation. For an official description of the cipher in English one can look up RFC 7801.) TheInevitable (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) Rijndael--> AES Advanced Encryption Standard. Kuznyechik--> Grasshopper StepanovVasya (talk) 13:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Any proof of that? The standard itself says on page 4: The cipher with block length of n = 128 bits, specified in this Standard, may be referred to as Kuznyechik block cipher. The same name is given in the cipher presentation on page 8. , in RFC 7801 and in all independent cryptanalysis papers I could find. These are six references supporting the name Kuznyechik. The only source using the name Grasshopper is a personal blog article which was written when the standard was still a draft and did not yet have an official name. TheInevitable (talk) 13:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) Читайте внимательно этот оффициальный документ Федеральное Агенство по Стандартизации чётко всё написано, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6BlkqAoxXq1LTgzMFFBekRFQWM/view?pref=2&pli=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by StepanovVasya (talk • contribs)

''This document presents the Russian Federation project for a new bloc encryption standard. It is a preliminary version which has not been validated or approved by the Russian Federation yet.'' Это не официальный текст стандарта, это предварительный и не проверенный перевод драфта. В окончательном тексте стандарта, ссылку на который я привёл ниже, Grasshopper не используется. (Translation: This document is just a preliminary translation of the draft standard. In the approved final text of the standard linked in my comment below name Grasshopper is not used.) TheInevitable (talk) 14:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Language on talk pages
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Grasshopper (block cipher) in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 09:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)