User talk:StephaniePaventy/Zoe-Vonna Palmrose/Cirith Ninniach Peer Review

Peer Review
Lead: this looks good so far; nice introductory sentence. You could add a few more sentences but it doesn't need to be much longer.

Content: the content is relevant, and it looks like you're planning to add more information, which is a good idea.

Tone and Balance: one sentence, "Palmrose is prominent and reputable for her professionalism in the accounting field", could be seen as biased/not neutral. The rest of the article is written in a neutral tone, however.

Sources and References: there could be more citations but again it seems like you plan to add more.

Organization: the sections you have so far make sense and are well-organized. If you can find enough information, you could add a section on "early life" or something like that, but since this is a living person you definitely don't have to.

Overall, the article needs more information added, but what you have so far is good information. Some suggestions I have are to add links to other Wikipedia articles for some terms: "chief accountant" and "audit-related debate" were terms I had not seen before. Also, instead of listing articles, you could write about what topics her articles cover. Same with awards - instead of a list, format as a paragraph. Otherwise this is a great start to the article, and an interesting topic! Great job! :) Cirith Ninniach (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)