User talk:Stephanlangdon

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Image copyrights
Hi, regarding Image:LilianNickell-hands.jpg, could you input source and copyright status? Thanks very much, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:29, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)


 * Please do not insert the stigmata photo until you have provided information regarding source and copyright status. Thanks, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:44, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on Church Universal and Triumphant. I saw one of their offices here and, if I remember it well it was in violet color. I would be happy if you could explain in the article their preference for violet. Thanks in advance. Andries 18:16, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Image:LilianNickell-hands.jpg
Greetings. I have listed Image:LilianNickell-hands.jpg on Images and media for deletion because it has no source or licensing information, and it's not listed in any articles. If you would like this image to be kept, please add source and licensing information, and include it in an article. If you need any help with this, just ask me. Thanks! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 22:30, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Three Blind Mice (Record Label)
A tag has been placed on Three Blind Mice (Record Label), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vicenarian (talk) 03:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Please do NOT remove the speedy deletion tag from the article. Place "hang on" below the speedy deletion tag. Thank you. Vicenarian (talk) 03:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Three Blind Mice (record label)
I have nominated Three Blind Mice (record label), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Three Blind Mice (record label). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 12:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Three Blind Mice (record label)
A tag has been placed on Three Blind Mice (record label) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Stephanlangdon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) David Hume Kennerly -