User talk:Stephaube/sandbox

Construction aggregate
The construction aggregate article was evaluated and reviewed in this assignment.

This article was well formatted with relevant subheadings. It gave a detailed summary of how the aggregate was mined and recycled. Relevant information pertaining to the usage and output of various forms of aggregate was clearly stated. The only portion that may have needed more information was under the history, as ancient Rome was only discussed.

There was a neutral stance in this article's point of view. More information was written about the recycled portion of aggregate, but this may have been due to the amount of information available.

Under the history portion of the article, as mentioned, only ancient Rome was discussed. There was a direct quote that seemed overindulgent in this area.

All but one of the citations have links, and the ones that do indeed work. The seem to be from ideal sources from science magazines. However, there was a lack of peer-reviewed science articles.

Some facts stated completely lacked any kind of source, especially the history portion. Most of the sources have a rather neutral tone of voice, but most are companies who supply construction aggregate. This fact may have an influence in the information if there were to be any bias. Most of the information seems to be up to date.

Under the Talk page there is a user asking for a better definition for what an aggregate does. They give an example of what should be stated.

This article is not listed as a "good article".

This topic was not discussed in class as of yet.

Week 5
Please see Jacob's sandbox for article information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephaube (talk • contribs) 17:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Week 6
Please see Jacob's sandbox for article information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephaube (talk • contribs) 04:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Response
Thabiso's response

-We should consider the farmer's perspective that may be against supply management. It should look into if there is any pushback on this idea. However, the sources may be subject to bias themselves. I think it is possible, we just have to be careful. -As we join our information into the main wiki article, we will be sure the run-on sentences are taken care of, as well as make sure every statement has a citation.

Pamela's Response -Good point in being more specific with our citations. We will address these examples as well as other areas where citations are needed.

Further work In addition to the points made by the feedback, we have decided to make some extra improvements. -We will add a photo or two where necessary. For example a photo showing the history of dairy farming in Canada may be beneficial. -Adding a diagram or figure outlining the structure of supply management. -Taking from Thabiso's comment, it may be a good idea to add a "controversy" section outlying the heated debate on tariffs and milk production — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephaube (talk • contribs) 03:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Week 12
Please see Jacob's sandbox for article information. (turnover of rough draft onto actual article done on his profile)