User talk:Stephderky

April 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:George Washington. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:George Washington, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please Unblock Me

 * The above statement does not fit to CU logs. Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

What does that mean? Why would she ever say something so vulgar? She’s a straight A student at a private academy Allie bohall (talk) 00:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Pardon me if I cry "bullshit!". There. I feel better. I would decline based on the "compromised account" problem. Yes, if you lose control of your account, you are accountable for that. As we have no idea what was done by whom, compromised accounts are not unblocked unless it can be determined they are no longer compromised. Well, I guess the check users do. So as this is now a checkuser block, I will leave this be and let a check user deal with it. Please read the pertinent parts of th WP:GAB. Oh, wait. The very first edit was vandalism, so the compromised thing holds no water. Back to my original comment. If you get past the checkuser thing, you will need to own up to the vandalism and convince us that your edits will be constructive. Thanks, -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 03:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)