User talk:Stephen/Archive October 2007

Wyps
the World Youth Peace Summit organisation is not a company or corporation .. you could have verified by following the link to the website of WYPS if you didn't believe what I was writing for the second time. Wyps is THE example of the new role of the army because Wyps is developing what's now known as "Peace bombs" ... and this technique can be used and was used for the first time in Yougoslavia by the blue helmets in a Peace Restoration mission to get in contact with traumatized people and to redynamize a traumatized society. But .. thanks for deleting ! Especially because Wyps was according to you a company !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by SvenAERTS (talk • contribs) 00:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

CNCIT = ?
From Nightcrawlers:Larger operations ship thousands of cases of pre-packaged Canadian CNCIT nightcrawlers throughout North America each day.

I've edited the "CNCIT" acronym(?) out of the previous passage twice and commented it on the article's talk page, but the person keeps adding it back. I've decided to ask some assistance of you, as not to start an edit-war. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wakandas black panther (talk • contribs) 14:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Palm Island
Thank you for the good work! Will be able to get into the article again a bit probably in the next week, this copy editing stuff is challenging! WikiTownsvillian 08:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Request for undeletion
Hi Stephen, I'm the author of the freeware audio metadata editor Mp3tag which had a nice article at Wikipedia till you've deleted the entry due to Spam. This page was created by users of the program and was kept up-to-date over several months. As there are many different software programs for music management listed at Wikipedia (for example EasyTag, Winamp, foobar2000, among others) and as there was no kind of advertisement or adspeak in that article and I want to kindly ask you to bring it back.--Fheidenreich 15:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Censorship
Mr. Stephen oversteps himself by censoring information that can be readily verified with a simple Google search. Case in point is the list of famous people who have been to Hazelden. As these are public people who have publicly talked about their recovery at Hazelden, you have no right to pull that information off. Stick to grammar, my friend. Dane Sorensen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dane Sorensen (talk • contribs) 22:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Sam Loves Tanja
Thanks for your help in deleting, and happy editing! Carter | Talk to me 09:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

More info on why EKAL page was deleted and ways to restore
Dear Sir

I started working on an article titled, Ekal, which redirected to title called, Ekal Vidyalaya. I made every effort to correct the page, it still was "flagged for correction" for a few days and then deleted. I see that in deletion log under your name

00:15, 19 June 2007 Stephen (Talk | contribs) deleted "Ekal" ‎ (content was: '#REDIRECT Ekal Vidyalaya')

Can you please specify what I can do it fix that page, and also a way to restore that. Thanks Viral Patel (202) 247-7434

BanniNation
Can you please explain why you put a page creation lock on

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BanniNation&action=edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasttimes68 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Because it's not notable and was being recreated multiple times. --Stephen1-800-STEVE 05:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

That is only your opinion that it is not notable. I also noticed you removed the Bannination reference from the Fark article. If you are in fact associated with Fark, then you really should recuse yourself from any item regarding Bannination.
 * Quit your little conspiracy theories. I'm not associated.  --Stephen1-800-STEVE 05:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Then why did you remove the reference to Bannination in the wiki article for Fark? Would you object to a "Criticisms" section in the main Fark article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasttimes68 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Note of block on 76.224.25.11
Hi, does this need to be noted on the user's page? Benjiboi 00:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, not necessary for IPs, it's in his block log --Stephen1-800-STEVE 00:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

ITN
Your wording is better. Thanks. --Stephen1-800-STEVE 01:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. --  tariq abjotu  01:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

User talk:203.57.68.13
Hey, an IP you blocked, is trying to get ahold of you... User talk:203.57.68.13. SQL(Query Me!) 05:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Steve, many thanks for the quick unblock, and SQL for passing on the request -- 203.57.68.13 22:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem! SQL(Query Me!) 09:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

User:74.210.98.82
Hey! I am curious as to why you blocked User:74.210.98.82 for violation of the three revert rule, as I think it fairly obvious that his edits to that article were purely vandalistic. Thanks for blocking him though! --Mark (Mschel) 09:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Azhure13
I would like to add a posting under Zeitgeist the movie but I found that it is protected. This is a documentary with legitimate sources. More info can be found about it here: http://zeitgeistmovie.com/statement.htm. This is different then the American Zeitgeist although similar subject matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azhure13 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Prior Deleted Article - Genesis Communications Network
The procedure is a bit hard to follow, but it says to start here (I think). The main objection to the original article was the lack of evidence that the programming of the network is heard on any "real" radio stations. I've compiled a list from my database - this is just on the stations that stream onto the internet. The type of radio stations that would typically carry this programming are low power AM stations who want free programming.... a complete search would probably turn up more affiliates. +-+-+--+---+---+-+---+---+ +-+-+--+---+---+-+---+---+ +-+-+--+---+---+-+---+---+
 * Show               | host        | callsign | DayOfWeek | StartTime | EndTime | CityName      | State |
 * Alex Jones Presents | Alex Jones | KCAA     | MTWTFXX   |      1200 |    1500 | Loma Linda    | CA    |
 * Alex Jones Presents | Alex Jones | KCXL     | MTWTFXX   |      1200 |    1500 | Liberty       | MO    |
 * Alex Jones Presents | Alex Jones | KTAE     | MTWTFXX   |      1200 |    1500 | Cameron       | TX    |
 * Alex Jones Presents | Alex Jones | KTAE     | MTWTFXX   |      1200 |    1500 | Cameron       | TX    |
 * Alex Jones Presents | Alex Jones | WIMS     | XTWTFXX   |      1200 |    1500 | Michigan City | IN    |
 * Animal Talk        | NULL        | WIMS     | XXXXXXS   |      1900 |    2100 | Michigan City | IN    |
 * Car Clinic         | Bobby Likis | WDAY     | XXXXXSX   |      1000 |    1200 | Fargo         | ND    |
 * Car Clinic         | Bobby Likis | WNDB     | XXXXXSX   |      1000 |    1200 | Daytona Beach | FL    |
 * Culture Shock      | Barry Lynn  | KCAA     | MTWTFXX   |      2400 |     100 | Loma Linda    | CA    |
 * Culture Shock      | Barry Lynn  | KRXA     | MTWTFXX   |      2400 |     100 | Carmel Valley | CA    |
 * Culture Shock      | Barry Lynn  | KRXA     | XXXXXXS   |      2400 |     100 | Carmel Valley | CA    |
 * Culture Shock      | Barry Lynn  | KTAE     | MTWTFXX   |      2400 |     100 | Cameron       | TX    |
 * Culture Shock      | Barry Lynn  | WMET     | MTWTFXX   |      2400 |     100 | Gaithersburg  | MD    |
 * Jeff Rense         |             | KCAA     | MTWTFXX   |       600 |     800 | Loma Linda    | CA    |
 * Jeff Rense         |             | KCXL     | MTWTFXX   |       600 |     800 | Liberty       | MO    |
 * Jeff Rense         |             | KLAV     | XTWTFXX   |       600 |     800 | Las Vegas     | NV    |
 * Jeff Rense         |             | WIMS     | XTWTFSX   |       600 |     800 | Michigan City | IN    |

Barry_W._Lynn is a notable person on the network, in addition to Alex Jones (who is getting a lot of media attention lately). Note that I'm not asserting that anything on the network is true. I stumbled on the deleted page when I added information to the article on Nick_Begich.StreamingRadioGuide 19:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * There was an overriding consensus to delete at Articles for deletion/Genesis Communications Network. Please take this to WP:DRV.  --Stephen1-800-STEVE 23:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

User:BadMojoDE
Go ahead. It was at Talk:Pro-pedophile activism and I sort of see where he was coming from. If you could also post a note in the section telling everyone that he has promised to stay away? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Reverting
I did not take into account 3RR in that instance. There is evidence that the user account is a continuation of vandalism used by an IP user, which I outlined when reporting for vandalism. Personally, I don't think that that was a 3RR issue, rather a vandalism issue, as that users edit history shows multiple examples of. Blocking me for reverting vandalism would have been extremely unjustified.Traditional unionist 15:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you have protected the page for a few hours? The block isn;t working as a deterrent.Traditional unionist 15:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Here we go again, 203.57.68.13
Stephen, looks like I was wrong. While I was telling you the truth that I'm not JackP, it seems I was wrong about the exclusivity of this IP address, 203.57.68.13. A user, Lima, just mentioned an edit (vandalism, reverted by Lima) that I didn't make, so, since I've registered an account...

You may want to reapply the original block to 203.57.68.13, ie, six months, or longer.

(I'm assuming that I can still log in under my username (and hence edit/contrib) even after the IP address itself is blocked? If not, any other suggestions?)--PaulxSA 03:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Viva Laughlin
First off, I'm not saying you're wrong. For all I know Viva Laughlin did in fact air last night on Network Nine. However, I can find no proof (nor has any been offered) that such is the case. Personal experience just doesn't cut it; if it did, the whole Wikiality thing would actually work and articles on (for example) Elephants would/could reflect grossly inaccurate information. In order to justify your edits you're going to need to find some sources to back it up, per WP:V. WP:V gives editors carte blanche to remove unsourced information like that, and to be blunt I will exercise that right if I need to. -- Y&#124;yukichigai (ramble  argue  check ) 08:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)