User talk:StephenChristianVoice

August 2022
Hello, I'm RteeeeKed. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christian Voice (UK) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RteeeeKed 💬📖 22:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * That is not true. I have made three edits:
 * 1 removal of the word 'extremist'. Kindly defend that word with NPOV.
 * 2 Description of Lord Ashbourne as 'the late'. The dear man is deceased. Unless you have resurrected him?
 * 3 Removal of the silly AOG reference.
 * 4 There is so much else wrong, but it seems a shame to jolt the God-haters out of their peaceful ignorance.
 * But why persist in factual inaccuracies and biased opinion? It just adds to the impression that Wikipedia is less than a legitimate source of reference. I'm going to replace my edits, and this time, do your research. StephenChristianVoice (talk) 22:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And yes, I am who you think I am. StephenChristianVoice (talk) 22:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, StephenChristianVoice. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Christian Voice (UK), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * That is perfectly clear. I get it totally. You are happy for an article to persist in inaccuracies, opinion and to remain out-of-date. I'll leave you to it, but you really should add my disclaimer or a similar one at the top, lest anyone mistakenly think the article has been written by people concerned to print stuff vaguely truthful. StephenChristianVoice (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And now some idiot puts it all back! Priceless. StephenChristianVoice (talk) 23:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)