User talk:Stephen Buel

Welcome!
Hello, Stephen Buel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

COI
Hello Stephen Buel. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--John (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

S.F. Examiner
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for the updates on the Examiner and Black Press pages. As the editor who originally added the sale information (based on published newspaper sources, though I see they turned out to be erroneous) I'm glad to see you have a better source with correct info. My question is -- do you have access to any source that goes into greater detail on the composition of the ownership? This source states that the new ownership company is "a consortium led by the Black Press Group", which would seem to imply that it's a corporate investment for Black Press, not a personal one for David Black. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 21:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Stephen - Thanks for getting back to me. No need to apologize at all, neither of us is getting paid for this and (unlike your day job!) there are no deadlines. I googled the heck out of this and that SF Weekly article was the only mention I could find of Black Press being involved as a corporation (other than the initial erroneous reports that Black Press was buying SF Examiner outright), so I'm going to close the book on this as far as my involvement goes and simply consider David Black to be an individual investor and SF Examiner to be unassociated with Black Press. I removed the Examiner from the Black Press navbox (footer navigation box) a couple days ago. Thanks for all your help getting the correct information in Wikipedia. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 18:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ps - yes, that was the right way to respond to me. There are actually two ways to respond to messages left on talk pages -- one is what you did, which is to post a response on the other person's talk page. The other is to continue the conversation on the page where it began (sort of like what I'm doing right now by "responding" to myself on your page). The disadvantage of that option is that the other party may not be aware that you've responded. I tend to follow the second option, but I put a note on the other party's talk page saying "I've responded to your comments on my talk page". You can do this by simply posting the code  , which renders:
 * Cheers. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 18:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Cheers. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 18:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Not the most intuitive of interfaces.