User talk:Stephen C Bosworth/sandbox

I am not clear about why my first attempt to edit the 'Wasted votes' article was deleted. If the following modified attempt is again deleted, please explain, in detail, what changes or codes I must use to make it acceptable (stevebosworth@hotmail.com). I propose that the following should be inserted immediately after the 1st paragraph of the existing article, i.e. Wasted votes: Stephen C Bosworth (talk) 19:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

The voting method called Majority Judgment (MJ) addresses the problem of qualitative waste.[1] Voters are asked to grade each candidate’s fitness for the office as either Excellent, Very Good, Good, Acceptable, Poor, or Reject. All these evaluations are counted to guarantee that the winner is the one most highly valued by a majority of all the voters. MJ is adapted by Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR) to elect all the members of a legislative body.[2] Each voter’s representative is the one most highly graded by that voter – no vote is wasted. Stephen C Bosworth (talk) 19:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)