User talk:Stephenson "Fry" Isbell

April 2017
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to LittleBigPlanet— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 21:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Stephenson "Fry" Isbell, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LittleBigPlanet. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: LittleBigPlanet was changed by Stephenson "Fry" Isbell (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923987 on 2017-04-22T22:53:43+00:00.

April 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LittleBigPlanet. Widgetsz89 (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arch Phidias


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arch Phidias requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Iambic Pentameter talk / contribs 00:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)