User talk:Stephkrebs12

Article evaluation

1. The article is very neutral and informative. 2. I feel that each section of the article is very well represented. 3. Yes all the reference links are usable and supports the claims in the article. 4. Yes, as far as i can tell all references and citations are credible and reliable. They do not show any sign of bias and are mostly from a neutral standpoint. 5. All information is updated and it seems that they have all the information that they could possibly find out. 6.It has a few comments or suggestions that are in the talk page but these suggestions have been taken into consideration and have been put into the article. 7. This article has been identified as among the best series of articles produced by the wikipedia community. It is also listed under the good article criteria. 8.This article differs because as we have said in class not all articles that are found in wikipedia should be trusted to be accurate, however, This is one of the few articles that i feel is as accurate as it possibly can get and it has numerous citations that make it more credible.

Welcome!
Hello, Stephkrebs12, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)