User talk:Steploff

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 23:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Common area maintenance charges was accepted
 Common area maintenance charges, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ~KvnG 21:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Out of Liberty (March 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The9Man was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Out of Liberty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Out of Liberty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Out_of_Liberty Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The9Man&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Out_of_Liberty reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- The9Man  ( Talk ) 09:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Historicity section
Hey! I just wanted to give you a little more context as to why I removed the historical accuracy section from Out of Liberty. Per WP:FILMHIST, "For films based on history or science, analysis should be based on reliable published secondary sources that compare the film with history or with science." The sources that are currently used look like they are just talking about the literal history of events, considering the source was published in '78 and most likely does not reference the 2019 film. As it sits now, the section is nothing more than original research and thus it should not exist on Wikipedia. If you could, please look for some sources commenting on the film and it's relation to historical events. It will improve the quality immensely. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

...oh, okay. cool. thanks. I'll go ahead and remove the section. I didn't know original research wasn't allowed. Thanks.

Nomination of Smith-Pettit Foundation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smith-Pettit Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Smith-Pettit Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JMWt (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2023 (UTC)