User talk:Steppu75

Image copyright problem with Image:Nokia ngage hack.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Nokia ngage hack.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Soxred 93 | talk count  bot 03:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:DVB-H hack.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Nokia ngage hack.jpg. The copy called Image:Nokia ngage hack.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 04:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

DVB-H
I've moved back the page to the original tile, for the following reasons: Feel free to tlak with me in my discussion page or in the article's discussion page. --Cantalamessa (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You did move the article to DVB-H/SH, but DVB-SH is a separate standard from DVB-H, as you can see here
 * You should have first asked in the discussion page, to see whether there is anagreemnt in doing such move.

Hello, I see that you keep moving the title of the article without discussing on the talk page. Please do so, and after reaching consensus, you can move the article to different name. I am going to ask other people their opinion. --Cantalamessa (talk) 14:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

As per Talk page guidelines, you should discuss the issues on the article talk page rather than repeatedly reverting without discussion. — Athaenara ✉  16:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * To User Steppu75

March 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you move a page maliciously, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oli Filth(talk) 12:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:DVB-SH OMA.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:DVB-SH OMA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:DVB-SH radio.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:DVB-SH radio.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:DVB-H hack.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:DVB-H hack.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LordKenTheGreat (talk) 22:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC)