User talk:Stepup.stepout

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The article is so screwed up now that in order to be fixed, someone will have to sit down and sift through it manually. Please just put it back the way it was. Moogle10000 06:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks For The Response
Thank you for the response ... It's not often that people actually will respond to messages I leave ;).

Sorry to hear that people are vandalising the article and embarassing you - Unfortuantely, that's one of the major detriments to Wikipedia. However, know that there are people (like myself) who go through and monitor changes to articles and revert acts of vandalism. (That's how I found the article in the first place.) The best way to prevent vandalism of this sort is to become a sort of custodian of the article - you make it a project to monitor it and constantly update it. (I have a few articles that I do that for ... )

That box contains lots of useful links that will teach you how to edit articles, etc. I would sincerely encourage you to help clean-up the article, as it sounds like you might be uniquely qualified to do so. (Since you said you were being embarassed by the contents, I assume you are a student at the school and would be able to verify the necessary information.)

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Moogle10000 07:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

August 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 05:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sarah Palin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Flewis (talk) 08:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sarah Palin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Flewis (talk) 08:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Palin love doll c.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Palin love doll c.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Starcity ai (talk) 08:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Palin_love_doll_c.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Palin_love_doll_c.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)