User talk:Stevannus rua

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Stevannus rua! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:48, Thursday, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

Declined A7 - Draft:Abdul mozid sheikh
I have declined your speedy deletion request for Draft:Abdul mozid sheikh. A7 is applicable only in article space, and does not apply to drafts. -- Whpq (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Stevannus rua, I told you on July 30 that you are not sufficiently experienced or knowledgeable to tag pages for speedy deletion and to stop doing so. You removed my post, ignored it, and once again demonstrated that you should not be speedy tagging. My first post was advice. This one is a warning. If you persist in abusing the deletion process, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. MER-C 14:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

You mean this article? Stevannus rua (talk) 09:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Do not send me any more e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

The account was mistakenly blocked for "Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes, likely covert advertising". This account has never engaged in spam or advertising on Wikipedia. It is used solely for constructive editing and improving Wikipedia. I apologize for any confusion and kindly request the block be removed so I may continue contributing productively to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Stevannus rua (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I recommend revoking talk page access and email access. Like Bbb23, I have been getting content-free appeals from this appelant despite there being an edit notice "I do not consider unblock or undeletion requests sent via email." and have also been petitioned twice on id.wp, again devoid of any reasoning. MER-C 17:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm writing regarding the blocking of my Wikipedia account. My account was blocked for suspected "Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes, covert advertising."
 * After being told not to e-mail me again, you did. I have therefore disabled your ability to send e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear @Bbb23,

I want to assure you that I have not engaged in covert advertising or promotion on Wikipedia. My contributions aimed to provide neutral, verifiable information to improve Wikipedia.

The edits in question were made in good faith to share knowledge, not self-promotion. I apologize for any misunderstanding about those edits. I never intended to spam or advertise, only to make helpful contributions.

Going forward, I will be even more mindful to ensure my edits meet Wikipedia's strict neutrality standards. I have learned from this experience and wish to continue adding valuable information per Wikipedia's policies.

I hope you will reconsider unblocking me. If any of my edits are still concerning, please advise me on constructive participation within the rules. I welcome any suggestions to improve.

Thank you for reviewing my unblock request. I appreciate your hard work to keep Wikipedia trusted and neutral. Please let me know if any other details would help resolve this block. I look forward to your reply. Stevannus rua (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

is closed.
tl;dr. With three, (count 'em! three!) open unblock requests here, an overly wordy UTRS ticket is superfluous. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * TL;DR: My account was mistakenly blocked for suspected advertising/spamming which I have never done. I am an educator editing Wikipedia in good faith for over a year to share knowledge, not self-promote. My edits aim to improve articles by adding well-researched info, fixing errors, etc. Monetization goes against my principles. I sincerely apologize if any edits came across wrongly as that was never my intent. I humbly ask for the block to be lifted so I can continue contributing constructively to this valuable encyclopedia. I am willing to cooperate fully with admins to resolve this situation. Thank you for your time and consideration. Stevannus rua (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I have commented out your unblock requests except the last one. You may have only one open at a time. If you persist in disrupting this page, I will remove your access to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The way to "resolve this situation" is to please follow instructions.  I will repeat them here.  Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information.  As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here ".
 * Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)