User talk:Steve1868

Seemingly excessive edit
Your edit of Steven Rattner's bio, with details of a Chrysler/White House matter and the NY State pension accusations against Quadrangle Group and Mr. Rattner, seems excessive to me. You simply labelled the accusations from ABC's Jake Tapper and perhaps separate details of the pension-fund issue "erroneous" and deleted them all. As far as I know the pension fund charges are still being considered. I don't know about the Chrysler matter. But, when | we see, two weeks after your edit, that Mr. Rattner was an investor in auto parts companies via Cerberus Capital Management -- and Cerberus was also the owner of Chrysler -- until he apparently divested the investement at the time of his appointment as Car Czar, I think the Chrysler issue is worthy of inclusion -- with updates/rebuttals as they emerge. And the pension issue is big. The edited section is visible | here. I'm not in favor of unproven allegations being overloaded on a bio. But to me, it looks like you're just trying to cosset a reputation with a bully exaggeration/short-shrift tactic rather than helping to build a fair account of a person in public life's life, in this your first and only edit under this user name, if you'll pardon a bit of editorial license here. All best. Swliv (talk) 20:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)