User talk:Steve5915

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Uriah Heep (band) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Barts1a (talk) 09:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Uriah Heep (band). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Barts1a (talk) 09:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Uriah Heep (band) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://Borntoperform.weebly.com/. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: External links
I don't care if the site was endorsed by the President of the United states, as long as it is on a free web-hosting service it will NEVER be considered a reliable source. NO EXCEPTIONS! Barts1a (talk) 09:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)