User talk:SteveC240

Welcome!

Hello, SteveC240, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Taylor Anderson(teacher), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 14:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Taylor Anderson(teacher)


The article Taylor Anderson(teacher) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO. Appears to be notable for a single event.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 14:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Taylor_Anderson(teacher), you may be blocked from editing. Do note that I'm speaking about you calling Wikipedians "assholes" in your edit summary of said page. Gorlack36 (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * That's not defamatory. It was a private comment. And it wasn't "Wikipedians". It was toward the one Wikipedian who promptly assumed that a notable person is not worth mentioning on this site.

It also was not "disruptive editing". I created a page which I thought was worthy. Someone with no authority determined it was not. And I showed my lack of appreciation. I can use whichever words I please. Delete my account. I don't care.

Also, keep in mind that you did use the plural of the noun, hence my assumption you meant it to Wikipedians in general; in either case, personal attacks such as calling people "asshole" is not allowed.Gorlack36 (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Not all pages deserved a place here. Also, that person that has "no authority" has no more authority than you or I. If you feel that strongly, and want to use abusive language, then Wikipedia isn't for you. If you do want to help out, though, you're free to do so (and encouraged). But please keep in mind that just because a page was nominated for deletion, doesn't mean it will be deleted.


 * The plural noun was referring to a more philosophical "they" which is commonly accepted as a reference to an unknown party. I don't believe that all Wikipedians simultaneously decided my article was garbage. I do not claim any authority. I am just disheartened that an article about someone who is references in dozens of articles by many news sources in several countries, and whose life has spawned charity ventures and educational programs was deemed not important enough for this site minutes after the article was created, not even giving me enough time to add a picture. That was the initial insult. Saying that my content was "defamatory" or "libelous" is ridiculous. I posted a solid article, and reacted hostilely when it was challenged immediately. Sue me.


 * Regradless of the fact that I was wrong in the warning I gave (I apologise for that), you did insult an editor and this isn't allowed. As I have said, it wasn't a sure thing; the article may not have been deleted, had you taken time to improve it.

That was the plan, asshole.

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User_talk:SteveC240, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. ''By all means, feel free to contribute still and edit the article. But do not insult other editors.'' Gorlack36 (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Since you are a Wikipedia sage, please instruct me on how to warn you about insulting me. I would like to redo this article, but it took some time, and I don't want to do it all over again just to have someone tell me my friend's life was not notable. Fuck yourself, asshole. Bye.

By the way, your actions would be a better case for defamation or libel than mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.42.255.108 (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by emailing a Wikipedia admin, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Note, given your insulting history of misusing your talk page I have revoked your access to it for the period of your block. S.G.(GH) ping! 15:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

That was the worst 31 hours of my life. Back, bitch.