User talk:SteveCorrigan1970

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Princess Sukseon have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Princess Sukseon was changed by SteveCorrigan1970 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887025 on 2021-07-25T13:11:07+00:00

wp:onus
Says "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.", So you are wrong, Onus is on those wanting to add something, not on those wanting to exclude it.Slatersteven (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * that's fair, i take that back, but doesn't negate my point. rewrite don't blank, the contributions are sourced, not vandalism.

Also you need top red wp:npa accussing users of wp:vandalism without good cause breached it.Slatersteven (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * i don't get it, you accused users of vandalism too, and I believe, without good cause.
 * No I did not, some of your reverts were Tagged as possible BLP issues or vandalism, I just pointed that out..Slatersteven (talk) 15:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Either you added those tags, or they were added by an automated bot.Slatersteven (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Indent
can you pelase read wp:indent.Slatersteven (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * thanksSteveCorrigan1970 (talk) 14:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
Woodroar (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest on Wikipedia
This may or may not apply, but the promotional aspect of some edits suggest it may be relevant, so I post the standard COI notice below: Hello, SteveCorrigan1970. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 18:45, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

About Mizanur Rahman
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you have been in conflict with other editors at the above article. Some things you need to understand about Wikipedia. One, disputes are settled by consensus, and right now you do not have consensus to include that material, so for now it should not be in the article. Two, you need to be careful not to Edit war, which is against the rules and can get you blocked from editing. I see that you sought advice at the Teahouse; that was a good thing to do, they are there to help new users. They gave you good advice and I advise you to take it. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Excellent advice, — Paleo Neonate  – 15:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)