User talk:Steve Else

Re: Made in America (The Sopranos)
Hi Steve,

The reason I reverted your edits was that the bulk of them were not reliably sourced and your selection of source material as made in the intervening edits between my reversions did not constitute reliable sources. In particular, YouTube and the Master of Sopranos blog on WordPress. Additionally, your insertion of the section was "undue weight" and should be condensed should you find reliable literature to support the assertions being made.

Regards,  James  ( T •  C ) • 1:38 PM • 02:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC

Hi James, Looks like we disagree about what a `reliable source' is. Discussion relevant to the article happens on those pages. I have presented the Dream Theory as precisely that, not something universally agreed upon. Steve
 * Hi Steve,
 * The page I linked to detailed what Wikipedia considers to be a reliable source. Blogs and YouTube in this instance are not reliable. Additionally, if this is your own work, it constitutes original research and cannot be used on Wikipedia.
 *  James  ( T •  C ) • 2:21 PM • 03:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

I did not refuse to respond to your message, I have nothing more to add to my first comment at this point. To use the word `refuse' was disingenuous.

Edit warring
Hi Steve, I noticed you reverted my edit (that had an explanation) without explanation. Please don't do this as it constitutes edit warring. I've reverted back to the previous version until a consensus can form on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me on my talk page, but please don't revert me without reason again. Thanks. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 04:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)