User talk:Steveio

January 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change article tags and style guides without discussion or sources, as you did at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Naismith&curid=86346&diff=471255746&oldid=471255101, you may be blocked from editing. Please refrain from inserting unsourced material and from removing tags without proper discussion, consensus, or sources. Львівське (говорити) 06:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Noted. Which is why I have added a source. --Steveio (talk) 08:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Warning
Your recent editing history at James Naismith shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

I'm opening up a discussion on the dispute resolution noticeboard since you continue to refuse to cooperate. You have been informed. --Steveio (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Result of the 3RR case
Hello Steveio. Please see the result of WP:AN3. You are encouraged to get consensus from a discussion before reverting Naismith's nationality again. If the edit war continues, blocks are possible. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)