User talk:Steveliang

Internet of Things
Hi, the reason I reverted your recent edits to the Internet of Things article was for two reasons. First, there is a policy on conflict of interest that effectively means citing yourself, promotion of anything you might connected to in some way, etc. are all frowned upon. In such cases where it would benefit the article but a conflict of interest is present, it's best to explain the changes you'd like to make on the article talk page and let someone else do it. Second, content on Wikipedia must be verifiable in reliable secondary sources and presented with a neutral point of view that presents things with proper weight in relation to the body of reliable sources. The problem in this case is that you added a large block of text about OGC SensorThings and only provided links to its website. People writing for reliable sources independent of the subject need to have written about it in order for it to be a neutral addition -- and even then someone may have a problem with the amount of weight it's given (but I don't personally know enough to make that call). Thanks. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  14:17, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Steveliang. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article SensorThings API, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 23:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Open Geospatial Consortium logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Open Geospatial Consortium logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)