User talk:Stevemonk

I reverted your edit because the information is reliably sourced and is as much part of the church's history as the two incidents in the late 1910s (both of which were also reported contemporaneously in the New York Times).

However, I admit I have been a little bothered by the lack of any followup on the Times ' part. I searched extensively for it but couldn't find anything. If there is some reliably-sourced material somewhere about the disposition of this, I'd love to be able to put it in. Daniel Case (talk) 16:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)