User talk:StevenInfanti

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, StevenInfanti. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Harrisburg University of Science and Technology ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Muon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Harrisburg University of Science and Technology with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. μ Talk  20:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)