User talk:StevenK71

November 2011
Your recent editing history at George Papandreou shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. ''Please see also the discussion at WP:BLPN. Link 1 and Link 2. According to the consensus at WP:BLPN the book is not reliable and cannot be used in the article. Thank you. '' Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to George Papandreou, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. ''Edits like this: Notice the look on the eyes are grossly inappropriate. Please do not add commentary like this anywhere on Wikipedia, especially in a biography of a living person. Please read WP:BLP. Thank you.'' Dr.K. λogosπraxis 00:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)