User talk:Steven Leser

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic Underground (2nd nomination). While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.

This is regards to this post by someone (presumably you) made at the DU forums canvassing other persons to try and influence the discussion. This is disruptive behavior, as was you unwarranted attack on my alleged motivations. Plesse stop this and discuss the merits of the article. That man from Nantucket (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I would recommend that your time would be better spent finding sources that meed Wikipedia guidelines. If the site meets notability guidelines, this isn't all that difficult, it happens all the time. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. Look at the Daily Kos article. This too suffers from similar issues in terms many of the sources use  trivial mentions, however there are a few non-trivial mentions by reliable sources, that may push this over the bar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by That man from Nantucket (talk • contribs) 02:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)