User talk:Steven P. Nohrden

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Steven P. Nohrden, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Airplaneman  ✈  01:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven P. Nohrden
A tag has been placed on Steven P. Nohrden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dwayne  was here! ♫ 01:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Steven P. Nohrden. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   02:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steven P. Nohrden, you will be blocked from editing. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   03:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Steven P. Nohrden. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Wikipelli Talk 03:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for continued removal of material. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 03:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

We were simply adding a profile for Steven P. Nohrden who is seeking election to the United States House of Representatives for the 112th Congress. [] Almost immediately after information was posted, slanderous vandalism occurred along with the suggestion for speedy removal. We now understand that we triggered the account block by removing the code.--Sheldoncowles (talk) 12:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)