User talk:Steven Weaven

April 2022
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Social Chain have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  19:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * If information isn't accurate you can edit it. Feel free to change my latest update but please don't remove it, this is a public information site. Steven Weaven (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Once again, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 19:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Social Chain


The article Social Chain has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Only one source of coverage; comments on only one small aspect of topic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Chain (Manchester) (May 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Social Chain (Manchester) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Social Chain (Manchester), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Social_Chain_(Manchester) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nearlyevil665&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Social_Chain_(Manchester) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665  07:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  16:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Rubbish, these are facts from a BBC article. This is pure censorship, are you being paid? Steven Weaven (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , I have had to remove this content again from the article. The vast majority of content that appears on the Internet (including the content copied from the BBC) is copyrighted. Wikipedia's policies do not allow us to copy and paste content from such articles. I would encourage you to re-read our copyright policy to become familiar with the specifics. I would also remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and that jumping to accusations of "being paid" could be seen as falling afoul of our rules on assuming good faith of others. It's important to work collaboratively with our fellow contributors. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Thanks, /wiae /tlk  17:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It must be a complete coincidence that all bad news is immediately removed from all 'Social Chain' wikipedia entries? LOL Steven Weaven (talk) 18:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Both S Philbrick and I patrol the list of articles that are likely to include text improperly copied from a copyrighted source. This draft popped up at the top of the list, and this is how we came across it so quickly. Thanks, /wiae /tlk  18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hi Steven Weaven! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Steven Bartlett (businessman) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Steven Bartlett (businessman), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  18:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a public page, it doesn't belong to Steven Bartlett. My edits should not be deleted, if they continue to be deleted I will contact the national press. Steven Weaven (talk) 08:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please feel free. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 19:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It is not a public page. It is a Wikipedia article. The policies and guidelines of Wikipedia apply. Please familiarize yourself with them. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 19:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  10:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I hope his d* tastes good. Steven Weaven (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Steven Bartlett (businessman)) for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 17:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 19:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I hope his d* tastes good. Steven Weaven (talk) 19:36, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Social Chain (Manchester)
Hello, Steven Weaven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Social Chain (Manchester), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Social Chain (Manchester)


Hello, Steven Weaven. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Social Chain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:16, 24 November 2022 (UTC)