User talk:Stevendjc

Commercial use of Image:09 paul-crouch.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:09 paul-crouch.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:09 paul-crouch.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:09 paul-crouch.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:09 paul-crouch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:09 paul-crouch.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

e-mail?
Is the e-mail really needed? Antonio Lopez (talk) 22:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

well. this is Wikipedia not MySpace. It is considered spam. Antonio Lopez (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Well It was a legitimate event that occured and some reference should be made to it.

What if...it was you...and you received an email from David Crowder?

There has to be some way for David Crowder to get in contact with this "Steven"

User:Stevendjc User talk:Stevendjc

thanks for signing sorry if I did it for you. Well I am not sure. It will get reverted if you put it on Wikipedia. Some one already reverted it. -- Antonio Lopez (talk) 22:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I moved your message here to avoid confusion. I wiil respond here. -- Antonio Lopez (talk) 22:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Heather sweazea
A tag has been placed on Heather sweazea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑ X - Man  16:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Deleted again -- high school high school and amateur athletes aren't considered notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)