User talk:Stevenfruitsmaak/Archive 2

about the Gorki picture, and its Dutch version
is a picture from the Dutch article. Maybe you can use that?

However... Wikipedia seems to be a bit confusing about pictures on the Wikipedia articles in other languages. There is a commons database which allows pictures to be used on all the Wikipedias, but some pictures are still only stored in (for instance) the Dutch Wikipedia. Now uploading them to the commons database is not that hard, but which makes matters worse ... there is the license issue, and the English Wikipedia is a bit sterner when it comes to that... so a picture on the Dutch Wikipedia isn't necessarily "legal" on the English Wikipedia.

What do you think?

Je moet het zeggen als je liever hebt dat ik berichten op deze pagina in het Nederlands schrijf!Evilbu 13:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

re WikiProject Belgium
Thanks for your invitation, but I respectfully decline. Of course you can always contact me in case of need. Cheers. Intangible 23:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

re Leaving
Thank you for the note on my talk page. I hope to return to editing regularily once I have more time, although I'm not certain when that'll be, with how busy I've been lately! -Severa (!!!) 14:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
OK, thanks for the invite :-) Sandy 14:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

re WP:CLINMED userbox move
Did userbox WP:CLINMED need to move, as it is about the encylopaedic process, not personal description (eg country, race, religion, hobies). Userbox migration states "If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Userboxes can be of a clear value to the encyclopedia-building project. Examples include those related to claiming professional or academic expertise, WikiProject affiliations, and claiming access to specialized resources and a willingness to conduct research using them upon request. Templates for these userboxes could stay in template or project space." Just as wikiprojects are valid items in teh wikipedia space, surely so is a feature to help one identify and contact its members ? So did it need to be moved ? :-) David Ruben Talk 14:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

No i guess it does not HAVE to move, but I feel it probably SHOULD be reverted as it is sort of "official" within the project (i.e. mentioned on the project's page and is there to help identify & contact its members). If it is not difficult to revert back, then would be nice (somewhat weak vote). I don't think it likely that others might try to create their own userspace template and then start arguing over which should be used, but probably better not to even open the door to the possibility - or for that matter some alternative practioner trying to insist on a WP:HealthCare template or the like. Has anyone else commented on this yet ? :-) David Ruben Talk 15:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Adoption
Thanks! I'm just interested in finding out starting points for contributing, tasks to do, general etiquette and so on. I won't be too much of a drain, don't worry. Seegoon 15:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Awesome, I've joined Wikiproject albums, I'll have a search for some more in the future I should think. On a minor note - how would I get my new userbox to appear on the right of my page? Seegoon 15:27, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. OK - whenever I run out of things to do, I'll come knocking. Or if I struggle with something, I guess. Seegoon 15:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

re: Adoption
You're asking the wrong person; ask User:Lgallindo! :) JoeSmack Talk (p-review!) 15:41, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

What do I do about this?
I've found a featured article (Julia Styles), which I honestly don't believe is really up to FA-status. I understand articles can be stripped of this label, and I think that a review might see peers change their minds. First off - do you agree that this article isn't quite up to scratch? And second, if you do or don't, where do I make my voice heard? Seegoon 01:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input. I'll mention it on the talkpage. Seegoon 12:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

New MCotW
NCurse work 06:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Hernia -- thanks for checking this out.
Thanks for researching this! As you say, it likely is true but as you point out, it needs to be supported by a reliable source, especially since this is a living person --A. B. 18:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikinews account confirmation
Yup, that's me... I've left a note on the Admin actions alert page aswell. Thanks for checking up on it! -- light darkness (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Admin experiences, replies
Hi! I'll give more attention to those dates. :) I like to be an admin, I block anons, protect pages, always try to remove the speedy backlog, I contact with others on IRC, so I really enjoy it. :) Good luck on Wikinews! Unfortunately I'm not registered there, but if I register, could I vote on you? NCurse work 07:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * It was my mistake, sorry, I just copied the text below the images. Thanks for the correction, and happy mopping out there. :) NCurse work 20:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

flexitarian
i use this usrbox on my page, why not u?

Shandristhe azylean 20:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Provinces_of_regions_in_Belgium#WP:RM

 * Talk:Provinces_of_regions_in_Belgium - Tobias Conradi (Talk) 03:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Belgium / Flanders
Hmm, ik weet niet of ik dat WikiProject Flanders nog zie zitten. Gezien het huidige klimaat in Vlaanderen was ik vooraf al bang van dit soort fanatiekelingen, en dat is er nu niet op verbeterd. Het zou mij ook meer over de historische regio gaan en niet over de huidige regio, die ik als deel van Belgie zie - tot voor kort zaten veel Belgische schilders b.v. in de category "Flemish painters", die heb ik allemaal verhuisd naar "Belgian painters" omdat de categorie dan veel logischer is. Als ik discussies zie over b.v. de nationaliteit van Copernicus, dan word ik bijna bang om meer mensen te betrekken bij dat soort discussies omdat 1 hardnekkige idioot hier een dozijn mensen dagenlang aan de praat kan houden. Soms ben ik het beu en loop ik maar gewoon weg. Piet | Talk 13:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Topics in Gastroenterology
Hi Steven!

I might be of help in certain areas of medicine, connected to IBS and functional bowel diseases, as well as other topics in Gastroenterology.

Cheers!

Eguirald 00:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Hi Steven,

Thank you for your reply. Hats off to your impressive list of achievements in wikipedia! Is there any chance we could communicate via email to examine further the ways I could be of help in the topics we have discussed.

Cheers!

Eguirald 01:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Anthrax toxin
I wrote this article and have a ton of figures for it, but I've been swamped with my classes and work (I'm a first year phd student). Also I haven't had the time to figure out how to post new images, nor have I taken the time to post the sources (about 50 of them). --Nate 03:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I updated the discussion page... is it adequate now? --Nate 18:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a ton for helping with the images! --Nate 00:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Setting edits to minor?
Stevenfruitsmaak wrote:


 * Shouldn't the edits GurchBot makes be set to minor by default?--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, yes, they certainly should... but as far as I am aware they are. Looking at Special:Contributions/GurchBot, I can't find a single non-minor edit. Are you confusing it with someone else? Or am I missing something? – Gurch 02:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

152.23.76.170
You should be aware that this is a publicly available IP address; ie: the user may be different in hour. Please check the talk page again, I left some questions about editting from an IP.

Stub types
Hi Stevenfruitsmaak,

You recently created Belgium-sport-stub and. New stub types should be proposed at WP:WSS/P before creation. This stub type's fate is being discussed at WP:WSS/D.--CarabinieriTTaallkk 22:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Medical pages - Aminto
Hi Stevenfruitsmaak,

Thanks for the invite to the medical pages, the comment I added was actually just because of our experience with our youngest (who's 4) having just had gasroenteritis, and we were giving him fructose in his home-made rehydration juice, which we then realised was a mistake, after a bit more internet research! I actually know virtually zip about anything medical, so will have to decline.

Best wishes,

Aminto

Aminto 19:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Science guidelines
Responded on my talk page. Sandy (Talk) 20:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Health Wiki Research
A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.

Please consider taking our survey here.

This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.

We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Thanks, Corey 14:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Catamenial Pneumothorax
Steven, The page on Catamenial Pneumothorax is outstanding, and is being viewed from all over the world. The first meeting on CP will be held in England Nov 16,2006. I am the author of the book Living With Lung and Colon Endometriosis: Catamenial Pneumothorax. Glynis

Salut Steven :) - Re: WikiProject Belgium
Merci beaucoup pour ton invitation. J'accepte bien volontiers de contribuer à ce projet. A très bientôt. Cebueq01 19:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)
Hi Steven,

Hope you enjoyed your break. Wrt leaving stuff out, my main reasons were:


 * 1) It is verbatim copied from elsewhere. That is what "see also" is for.
 * 2) It doesn't belong in a "Style Guide", which is largely concerned with layout, choice of English, formatting, etc. Have a look at the other style guides. I do think there are big chunks of the current guide that should go in other WP Medicine guidelines. For example "Sources for medical articles".
 * 3) The big tables for section headings. Much of the explanitory notes are really just telling us stuff we already know. It also over-emphasises the importance of the headings offered.
 * 4) The cookie-cutter text. Look at the articles created by the folk on WP Medicine. 90% of them are short, with few sections. Only those approaching good/feature quality actually merit all those headings. Also, I have a problem with "official guidelines" recommending headers that aren't actually used anywhere. Some of the drug headings only appear on Paracetamol, and not at the top-level. I think the best guidance we can give editors is just to write content. Once you've got so much content that you need to chop it into sections, then you can start to think about which to use and what order. Starting an article with all the sections in place isn't the best approach IMO.
 * 5) Strunk & White set the example for brevity and remving redundancy.

I haven't given a full rationale for my other changes since I didn't know what the response would be. The silence is disappointing. I've chosen my text with care, and I think the brevity of some parts is a plus - nobody wants to wade through lots of text. I hope you can find stuff to use. I'd be kinda discouraged if there was nothing you liked. Perhaps even take some of the alternative version and add back those things you think are essential.

Cheers, Colin°Talk 22:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Medicine Collaboration of the Week
WS 21:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Accepted
Hi. I accept the adoption. I have got you a question: How can I review submissions???

--TomasBat 23:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply
What I meant meant was: Unregistered users can submit an article and, later on, a registered user will review it and either decline it or accept it, if it is accepted, the content is created on Wikipedia and if its declined the content isnt created. I am a registered, so How can I review these submissions???

If you dont understand what I mean, please see Articles for Creation

Thanks, You Answered My Question
Thanks. The last you wrote answered my question.

--TomasBat 00:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi there!
n:Wikinews:Administrators.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thx. I am also an admin for the Inupiak Wikipedia, if that's relevant. Also, my writing stats for Wikinews are actually 105 now, thanks to the Toronto/Brampton/Mississauga election interviews. --  Zanimum 18:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikibreak
I'm taking a Wikiholiday because I cannot combine being a Wikipediholic with being a medical student facing exams. I'll be back in February.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Good luck with your exams. Don't try to sneak back before then. We'll be watching... Colin°Talk 20:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Second that. Good luck and enjoy (enjoy? What am I thinking?) :) Fvasconcellos 21:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, good luck with the exams. Cheers. 01:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I am already listed
Hello there, regarding your message on the list of WP:CLINMED participants, I am already listed under my name, Kyoko. The account name is User:Tachikoma, but I changed my signature using code that is something like this: Kyoko. I apologise for any confusion this may have caused. Thank you. -- Kyok o  20:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Belgium
Hoi Steven,

Ik ga me niet direct engageren voor het wikiproject België, gezien ik nu ook aan mijn doctoraat schrijf. Ik heb al verschillende taken wikipedia-taken opgenomen en zie nu dat mijn activiteitenterrein zich uitbreidt naar wiktionary, alsook internationaler wordt (interwiki en een vertaaltool voor wiktionary (wikt:User:Annabelleke/Transtool)). Dus veel tijd is er niet meer voor België-artikelen. Hetgene ik doe is nogal variabel, maar als je dringende hulp nodig hebt, moet je maar een seintje geven hé.

Annabelleke 14:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC) (Annabel at wikipedia nl)

Wikimeet in Ghent
I could actually just make it, I suppose, if leaving Orthodox church hall in a hurry. However, there is someone who promised to come I do not particularly want to see. Sorry, but in the discussion about Siberian wiki I have seen so many swastikas and Ku Klux Klan capes, that I have had enough for a few weeks, without getting in close contact with one of these guys. I know it sounds funny, because after all I WILL be asking forgiveness for the trespasses I am willing to forgive. But there is also something there about not being led into temptation. ;>) --Pan Gerwazy 20:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I regret that you should not come for this reason. I will be there and yeah, there will also be people (more than one), which I do not prefer to see. However, I allways say, take it easy and enjoy the day. You are always welcome. Annabelleke 22:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Admiral Freebee albums
Ik ben persoonlijk voorstander van een aparte pagina over de albums. Er kan overigens zeker nog interessante inhoud worden toegevoegd aan die artikels, en ik vind de manier van bv Gorki eigenlijk niet zo mooi/overzichtelijk. Maar heb de laatste tijd niet zo heel veel tijd voor Wikipedia, en ben niet meer zo actief betrokken. Dus ik zal je ook weinig in de weg leggen als je het toch wilt veranderen. --Stijn Vermeeren 20:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Expert-Medicine
Template:Expert-Medicine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.Brad Beattie (talk) 17:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:WERS
Hey, just wanted to say thanks for helping out with the WP:WERS effort. It's much appreciated. Currently, there only seem to be a few lonely users working on it. --Brad Beattie (talk) 12:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Belgium edit
Hi Steven. Your removing of headers caused a far to long Belgium intro putting the 'contents' box out of sight. In fact, the headers are quite informative – allowing one to skip whatever one may not be interested in ;-). The figures you reverted to were even more inaccurate than the reverted ones; I had an edit conflict when trying to save updated figures (based on current Belgian population 10,419,000 and interpolation of figures from Communities and regions of Belgium with a middle between 85-90% (thus 87.5%) of French-speaking inhabitants of the Brussels Region). I avoided rough rounding so as to allow verification and prevent subjective 'correcting'. Yours truly, — SomeHuman 23 Nov2006 20:23 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you Steven for your useful suggestion about Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest.

Eguirald 17:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

P.S.: Best of luck in your exams. Everyone here is hoping you are able to study smart and do well - and come back unscathed.

Archiving
Instead of hiding old comments on your talk page, you may want to see How to archive a talk page instead. --  Netsnipe  ►  14:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)