User talk:Steviedpeele

LEather heads
have you checked Johnny "Blood" McNally section there is no proof or refrences for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.203.136.247 (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DTfontlogonew.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DTfontlogonew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NGU.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NGU.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:DT07.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DT07.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:DT07SS.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DT07SS.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Teixeira picture
Just wanted to say, nice picture of Mark Teixeira you got. I've added quite a few Braves' player photos myself (including Salty). I would have loved to have been there tonight but I was busy.► Chris Nelson  04:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah I was really excited when I was watching it, I was hoping Bobby would pinch-hit him. I love the moves Scheurholz made yesterday. I'll probably end up at the game Thursday, can't wait to see Tex in action.► Chris Nelson  04:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I just saw your pic as someone's profile pic on facebook, haha! ► Chris Nelson  19:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

FeCl3+ Cl2
It would be reassuring to see a ref on the structure of the Cl2/FeCl3 adduct to reassure readers that this suggestion is substantiated with evidence vs chem folklore. The Fe would be tetrahedral most likely. And the picture implies that it is the bound Cl of the Cl2 that is the electrophilic one, etc, etc. --Smokefoot (talk) 16:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I think that I've seen the same sort of things that you mention, I was just curious about any evidence. It's standard fare and the thrust of your edits seemed positive.  Happy editing, --Smokefoot (talk) 18:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dinnerparty.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dinnerparty.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:Triphenylmethanol-synth.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Triphenylmethanol-synth.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Triphenylmethanol-synth.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Triphenylmethanol-synth.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chairmodel.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chairmodel.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Imidazole
Hello. You've written this: "Imidazole is highly polar compound, as evidenced by the many dipolar resonance structures ", which I don't think is correct. Just becaue it has many dipolar resonance structures it is not necessarily polar - they might all cancel each other out for example - so I've removed this sentence. Chris (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I reinstated the resonance picture, since we don't have anything better at present. I removed it initially because the arrow-pushing in particular can fool inexperienced readers that dont understand the fiction that is implicit in such images.  A preferrable image would lack the curved arrows because nothing moves.  Thanks for reminding me of my ill-advised deletion and accept my apologies if my edit seemed offensive.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Na2MO4
Since you seem interested, I offer some comments that you can take or leave. Na2MoO4 is not an ion pair, it is an infinite polymer (few among us can draw such species, the reigning guru being User:Benjah-bmm27) Of course many people draw such cartoons for related species. The Mo=O and Mo-O- parts are of course equivalent (you know that, I am sure, since you like resonance). And finally, it's tetrahedral (d0 species tend to have point-on-sphere geometries). Again, do what you want with these comments. It's great to see you contributing. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * well, the picture you present is indeed a great improvement over the what was there before, so the article was improved with your change. One step at a time.  A further refinement of my comments (before someone jumps on me as well), the Mo-O contacts are usually considered to have significant triple bond character.  And these structures of course depend on hydration, etc.  The pic is fine and maybe, in some ways, superior to the almost impossible-to-fathom solid state structures.  Most readers, like you, just want to know what is in soln.  Kind of a picky point, overall.   If we get hung up on being perfect, then no one edits.  --Smokefoot (talk) 04:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

File:DIMBOA-ballstick.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DIMBOA-ballstick.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 17:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

File:DIMBOA-ball-and-stick.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DIMBOA-ball-and-stick.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 17:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

di-no source

File:DIMBOA-ball-and-stick.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DIMBOA-ball-and-stick.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 11:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

File:Dinnerparty.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dinnerparty.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:AA1662-Trinidad-preflight.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Texbraves.JPG


The file File:Texbraves.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)