User talk:StewieGriffin1998

November 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Joe Keery. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 23:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Beauty and the Beast (2017 film)
You are editing against a very clear consensus, as discussed extensively on the article's talk page, the Dispute resolution noticeboard and at WP:AN/I. Another editor was indefinitely blocked shortly before you arrived for restoring these categories. Do not restore them again.

If you disagree with the consensus, you will need to discuss the issues on the talk page and establish a consensus to include them before you restore them. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Your recent editing history at Beauty and the Beast (2017 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You have been reverted on this issue several times. Do not re-add the categories without a consensus to do so or you will be blocked from editing. This has been discussed at Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film)/Archive_1, Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film) and Talk:Beauty_and_the_Beast_(2017_film). It has also been discussed at the dispute resolution noticeboard (twice), WP:AN/I (twice) and repeatedly on User_talk:Saiph121. Please note that Saiph121 has now been indefinitely blocked fro editing Wikipedia, specifically for restoring one of these categories after all of that discussion.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Don't revert without discussing things
You have not violated WP:3RR yet at Once Upon a Time (TV series), but you are still edit warring. presented reasons for his reverts (granted, in his edit summaries instead of the talk page), you've said nothing.

Discuss the matter at Talk:Once Upon a Time (TV series). Discuss all changes that get reverted on the article's talk page instead of just reverting without discussion. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Categorization alphabetization
I'm not going to revert this because I don't think it really matters at this point, but just so you know, WP:CATDEF says that after any eponymous categories, " ...the order in which categories are placed on a page is not governed by any single rule (for example, it does not need to be alphabetical, although partially alphabetical ordering can sometimes be helpful). Normally the most essential, significant categories appear first." Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Batman Begins. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Also, see WP:CATDEF. DonQuixote (talk) 18:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at Batman Begins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Per WP:CATDEF, do not re-add the category without showing that reliable sources commonly and consistently define the subject as having the defining characteristic or you will be blocked from editing. DonQuixote (talk) 01:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Seriously, you would need to cite an expert that says what you're trying to say--because no one can verify that you're an expert. See WP:VERIFY. Also, discuss on the talk page. DonQuixote (talk) 01:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm waiting for your response there. --Neil N  talk to me 13:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wall Street (1987 film).  The Old Jacobite The '45 21:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 16:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Genre
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 01:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

To get unblocked you'll need to respond here and address the concerns of other editors. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 01:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Note block evasion and SPI --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 22:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 13:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)