User talk:StewiekilledLois!!

Notability of Ian Cumming
A tag has been placed on Ian Cumming requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. redlock (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I looked at the last edits you did, and they still leave this as an article about a scientist-turned-businessman, with poor sourcing and no particular assertion of notability. In fact, the article was borderline advertisement for the subject, his patent(s) and his company, and could have been deleted as such. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You've got to establish notability. Where are the verifiable references to books, magazines, or newspapers which have profiled this person or this company? What makes it qualify under our standards for companies, or him under our standards for people? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
The recent edit you made to Choate Rosemary Hall constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.   CWii ( Talk  00:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC))