User talk:Stgpcm

Welcome!
Hello, Stgpcm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  Spencer T♦ C 17:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi!
Hi! Thanks for the heads up on my talk page. If you see Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos/Archive 3, a discussion was started here: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Spelling which all seem to end up leaning towards the more orthodox variant, "publicly". If the objection is that it is accepted in American English, note that the American Heritage Dictionary lists "publically" as a nonstandard variant of "publicly". TheBlueBlur (talk) 23:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

February 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heinkel He 50. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Schneider Trophy. more of these unexplained edits, whose edit summaries only cover half of what's going on. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Stopped.
 * I have reached out to User_talk:Sturmvogel_66, but while trying to reach consensus the user has continued to systematically remove refbegin blocks from pages, in some cases mixing them with other edits. I believe this behaviour shows a lack of good-faith on their part.
 * Stgpcm (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I see discussion on their talk page--and I see that does not seem to agree with you, and they bring up ACCESSIBILITY, which makes me want to ping . I reported you to AIV but no admin had yet looked at it and I removed the report: I just want you to know that if I hadn't been a bit tired of adminning, I would have blocked you already. So while I'm glad you stopped, you can be glad I haven't been in a blocking mood. Drmies (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing references without explanation -that is disruptive.Nigel Ish (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Have I removed any since 02:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC) ? There was an explanation, I reverted those edits where refbegin was removed.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:SABRE


A tag has been placed on Category:SABRE indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)