User talk:StickMannequin

Proposed deletion of Jeunvie (Skin care)


The article Jeunvie (Skin care) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable; can't verify Tatler reference, but seems unlikely to be significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 22:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Roscelese... I understand that the reference is not any good now. I've done a few changes to the article, and would really appreciate some input from you how I can improve it - I appreciate any help from someone with your level of experience. I've also done some edits to a number of cosmetics companies to improve the grammar & citations, I would appreciate your input on those as well if you have time. Thanks in advance -StickMannequin 23:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeunvie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeunvie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeunvie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeunvie Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Jeunvie Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Future life progression for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Future life progression is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Future life progression until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —PermStrump ( talk )  16:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Penelope Jean Hayes) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Penelope Jean Hayes, StickMannequin!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good work!"

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robert G. (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Cristina Corbin
Hello. I am not certain that Cristina Corbin meets notability criteria. Please provide more reliable, secondary, independent sources that are about Corbin. Her own reports on Fox News, her work related biographies, and trivial mentions or credits do not attest to notability. Corbin's own works are primary sources, and per policy, articles should not be built primarily with primary sources, as it risks inflating the appearance of notability, and risks original research (i.e. conclusions or statements that don't already exist in reliable published sources). Please review Notability (people), as ewll as Biographies of living persons policy. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cristina Corbin


The article Cristina Corbin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage of Corbin found in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, per WP:GNG. Reporting by Corbin cannot be used to establish notability, nor is it noteworthy that a Fox News employee appears on Fox News shows. The few secondary sources are passing mentions, requiring original research to infer notability. May one day win major awards or receive extensive coverage herself, but for now it is too soon for inclusion in an encyclopedia."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Almay Logo 2017.png
Thanks for uploading File:Almay Logo 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)