User talk:Stickee/Archive 1

Your request for rollback
Hi. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 04:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Cheeseburger
Don't know about you, but its 8:00 in the UK and its nice to have at least one other rollbacker on Huggle. Here, have a cheeseburger: 

Acather96 (talk) has given you a Cheeseburger! Cheeseburgers promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Cheeseburger, whether it be someone you've had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

Spread the goodness of Cheeseburgers by adding {{subst:Cheeseburger}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Abused policing power
I believe you abused your roll back power as I made an honest link to a website I am not involved with for informational purposes only on the 'personal wedding website' page... if I were a more sophisticated user I would figure out how to share this information with others but am satisfied to have notified you of your abusive action. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.11.135 (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The disputed diff can be viewed | here. Regardless of whether it was spam or not, that comment does not adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. The example has been restored, but not the comment stating that it is an "excellent example". Feel free to popst another message if you have any more concerns. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 10:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi,

Just wanted to say thanks for dealing with the vandalism on my user page. Mephistophelian (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

BJS

 * Hey Stickee, thanks for restoring the BJS page. You have the eyes of a warrior ;) Ottawa4ever (talk) 09:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Homie
Re your message: Not a problem. I think we were stumbling each other trying to clean up the same mess. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: My Talk
I read the article and made changes accordingly. The name Durkee stands for more than what the original page entailed. I will add a sepperate page for William Durkee (Durgy) as well. I appreciate your comments and help in learning the process. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveDurkee (talk • contribs) 08:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a problem Stickee (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I will have to add pages for all of those people then. I really don't think its okay to have the explanation of the term be for a single source because that is not what it means.  I also don't understand if I add a surname page why you wouldn't have that as a primary term on the disambgu page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveDurkee (talk • contribs) 08:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ignore my comment of making a page just for William Durkee (Durgy). It may just be best to create a family history page called Durkee (surname) as BikerBiker suggested, and then place a bullet point to that page on the Durkee disambiguation page. Oh, and remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~) at the end. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

rbaal
Hello Stickee. Sorry I got a bit hot under the collar but I find it hard to play fair with somebody who hides. I suspect that user has a reason to hide their identity.

The issue I have is that the page was doing a very poor job at representing the situation howeevr it is very hard to come up with cites for my comments. At leas one was on the radio and the event occured 3+ years ago. Trying to cite that is an issue. Yet critics have the ability to cite places like the NZHerald which have been proven time and time to make thsi sort of stuff up. Its very one sides and in the case of that article was very one sided.

Oh well off to try and wade through 6000 google hits

--Rbaal (talk) 02:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * There is no need to get angry if someone is not logged in. If a person is showing their IP on wikipedia, it gives them less pricacy because you can find their ISP and location.
 * If you believe that the Wikipedia article is biased, you are more than welcome to clean it up. But make sure to state sources when making any factual claims. If you need any more help, be sure to contact me. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 02:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Antisemitism in the Arab World
The following violates the neutral point of view policy in the article "Antisemitism in the Arab World", under the heading for Lebanon:

"In the discourse of Lebanese street politics, "Jew" is a common insult, often used to tar those suspected of collaborating with America and Israel.[47]"

The reference is an opinion from a Time magazine blurb on the Jews in Lebanon. Most of the blurb discusses how a MUSLIM Lebanese man is helping to restore Jewish heritage in Lebanon. The author of the Time blurb is stating an unverified anecdote, (perhaps, based on his experience?), that in no way is representative of how Lebanese view Jewish people. In fact, I know many Lebanese people that would never use the word Jew as an insult. If this statement is to remain, then I will add a statement saying that, "Most Lebanese would never use the word Jew as an insult." It's my word against the author's. The Time piece is an absolute paradox. The author is saying how a Muslim man is helping restore Jewish symbols in Lebanon, while painting all Lebanese as racists against Jews. This is absolute slander against a people and I will not let it stand. Therefore, this statement should be deleted.

Corrector555 (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, Corrector5555. An extract from your post reads
 * " This article would be better called 'Discrimination of Jews in the Arab World.' Antisemitism in the Arab world, a term coined by people that don't really understand racism".
 * This particular statement was posted in the first sentence of the page and most definitely does not adhere to the neutral point of view policy, and has accordingly been removed.
 * I do agree with your removal of the comment about Jews in the Lebanon section. However, placing a paragraph in a comment tag in the mainspace page about your opinion on it is not appropriate. Feel free to delete the Jew comment again. If you have any further questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I have deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corrector555 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

deleting wantonly
so where is this information relevant in the number of the beast article ? what part of newsweek's coverage of the topic is not relevant to the topic. you tell me where i put it in the article. You can't say this is not relevant to the topic that's PoV from you. Correct my addition but you can't say it's not about the number of the beast, Newsweek says that's the topic. You're not in accord with newsweek. How does it feel to be off-topic with the mainstream ? Your deletions are PoV. It's none of your business giving your opinion, just report the facts and it's newsweek here. A good source. And answer this. I'm going to go to arbitration: you made PoV vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geiremann (talk • contribs) 14:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, Geiremann. If you believe the contribution about the Newsweek magazine should be included, you can talk about it in its talk page. I have already created a section to discuss it there. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Ummm
Hey I contacted that editor again... Maybe he has a hard time understanding english, so I hope that my message could be simple enough to for him/her to comprehend. I am not exactly sure it is vandalism, but I guess it's always best that we assume good faith... Thanks for your efforts :) CrimsonBlue (talk) 07:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does seem that the editor is not too strong in English. I will wait and see if he replies to the messages or adds the contribution again. Stickee (talk) 08:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_Unleashed is being vandalized 79.209.28.92 (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thankyou, the vandalism is being reverted. Stickee (talk) 02:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
BTW, what did he say about me? I want to know.
 * Can't remember exactly, but he/she blanked the page replaced it with something defamatory. Stickee (talk)  08:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

No Thanks
Dear Stickee,

Do you remember when you deleted that article on the 2008 Summer California Wildfires? You remember what that article said? Congratulations, buddy, you are now guilty of concealing the truth! And on Judgement day God will punish you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.133.81.102 (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Only administrators have the right to deleted articles. Perhaps you were looking for the Summer 2008 California wildfires article, which has not been deleted. Stickee (talk)  08:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Need your help with something.
Please message me back. I don't know if this post is public or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkeningReene (talk • contribs) 12:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, all messages you post here or on your talk page are public and are visible by anyone. What is it you need help with? Stickee (talk)  08:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:RFPP, Holland high school
TFOWR 09:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

PJ Bevis
Cheers, was starting to smell an edit war.  JRA _ Westy Qld2  Talk 09:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Though, the edits were clearly vandalism and/or censoring of information. Stickee (talk)  09:37, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Meh, didn't seem to phase him. I've put in a admin intervention report.  JRA _ Westy Qld2  Talk 09:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Notenglish tag
Hello Stickee, maybe I was just faster than you, but please remember to list pages you tagged with "notenglish" at WP:PNT. There's a template code for c&p and an instruction at the bottom of the tag notice. Happy editing, De728631 (talk) 13:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, thankyou very much. Stickee (talk)  13:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome. De728631 (talk) 13:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Transworld Group - We bring you the World
Hi Stickee, transworld is the group company, which is formed 30 years before. I would like to keep them on our wikipedia Csenthilmurugan (talk) 09:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Welcome to wikipedia Csenthilmurugan! The page Transworld Group was tagged for speedy deletion because the entire article was simply an advertisement for the organization/company, and was classified as spam. You are more than welcome to re-write the article in a neutral point of view, making sure that the information is encyclopedic and not an advertisment. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  09:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Franciszek Maurer
the site www.franciszekmaurer.com is hosted on alfalabs.net/fr Owner Mariusz Maurer has granted copy permission to create this article in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gliwiczanin (talk • contribs) 19:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, make sure to read Requesting copyright permission before posting copyrighted content with permission, because all content on Wikipedia is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License. Be sure to read the paragraph that reads:

"'To use copyrighted material on Wikipedia, it is not enough that we have permission to use it on Wikipedia alone. That's because Wikipedia itself states all its material may be used by anyone, for any purpose. So we have to be sure all material is in fact licensed for that purpose, whoever provided it.'"
 * If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to ask me. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  22:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franciszek_Maurer
the copyright notice on source web site has been changed to allow usage according to Wikipedia rules: http://www.alfalabs.net/fr/about.html please reinstate this page, or send me a message so I can post it again. Gliwiczanin (talk) 06:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent! You can now replace the Franciszek Maurer page with the text you had copyright permission for. Stickee (talk)  07:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy tagging
Hi. Thanks for tagging the page about Michael J. DePasquale Jr just now, but db-test was not the right tag to use - that's only for things like "is this how to do it?" or "trial page no. 1". For a personal attack like that, the thing to do is blank it (to get it off view as soon as possible) and tag it db-a10 or db-attack, which puts it in a high-priority queue for admin attention and generates a suitable fierce warning for the author's talk page. There is good advice about speedy tagging at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Keep up the good work! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:07, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice, though, I just noticed the page had a super-long title, and tagged it with .  would have been more appropriate, but I did not read the page any further after tagging it as a test. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  22:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

BLP PROD
I have provided external links that act as firm reference to my biography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtlbvoc (talk • contribs) 13:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, the BLPPROD (deletion nomination) tag has been removed from the page. I also did some minor formatting of the page by adding titles to the various sections. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  14:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Mindaugas Katelynas article
Be patient, goddamn it! I was getting to the external links. Wait some time before putting the tag! Henkt (talk) 02:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Now that sources have been added, the BLPPROD tag has been removed. There is no need to get angry or worked up; the tagging of the page is simply to help clear out any mis-information on BLPs. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  02:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please slow down
I see that a couple of other people have noticed that you are a little hasty in your deletion tagging, and I'd like to add my voice. John George Aulsebrook Kitchen clearly says in the first sentence that the subject was born in 1869, which would make him 140 years old, and clearly has a source as its last sentence, so fails both tests of eligibility for WP:BLPPROD. The idea of new page patrol is to read new articles and come to a considered decision as to what should be done with them rather than to race to be the first to slap on a deletion tag that will serve to turn away editors from Wikipedia. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, my apologies, didn't notice his date of birth. Thanks for the advice though, I will take into consideration when new page patrolling in the future. Stickee (talk)  23:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   03:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

CSD A1
Thanks for the tip. I was actually wondering about that, but hadn't seen the relevant policy. Tsumetai (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. All relevant information about New Page patrolling can be found on this page. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  14:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Danish rong barru
Hello Stickee. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Danish rong barru to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question - A7 doesn't apply to games. We could do with a speedy for "Blatantly something made up one day" but proposals get turned down on the ground that really blatant ones can be dealt with as G3 hoax, but I don't think that applies here as I don't think this guy is trying to deceive - he wants to tell the world about his new game, and doesn't realise that's not what WP is for. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I was not aware A7 doesn't apply to games, I will use PRODs in the future instead. I do also agree that G3 hoax does not apply for that article, because he is not being malicious in any manner. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  15:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

D. W. Jessup (politician) Sudbury Ontario
Hello, I have one source frome the Sudbury Star our local news paper and I am currently researching additional sources. Is that sufficient for the time being?

Please advise

Adam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam C Toews (talk • contribs) 11:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your contributions, the deletion tag has now been removed. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  11:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Dear Stickee

Thank you for removing the tag. I plan on retrieving 5 references today. Adam C Toews Adam Caldwell Toews (talk) 11:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Deleting the lying truth.
Are you lying about it getting deleted or telling the truth. Because I'm not lying about not knowing what you think and that is the truth.--Truth about lies (talk) 07:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

feindura cms
hi you said you included feindura in the php flat file CMS list, i cannont find it, or do you still checking :-)

greetz

fabian (178.25.216.98 (talk) 14:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC))
 * Hey fabian. Please read the message I added to the List of CMS talk page page. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  22:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

ok, look in the cms list discussion.. ich have no idea how i make a talkbak :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.216.98 (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

List of Puerto Ricans
Thank you for adding the name of Jimmy Crespo to the list, however his his name was removed because it is clearly stated that all additions to the list "must provide a reliable verifiable source which cites the person's notability and/or the person's link to Puerto Rico, otherwise the name will be removed." Place feel free to add the name once more to the list once you can provide us with a proper source. The reliable verifiable source that we ask for are magazine, newspaper articles etc. other then personnel websites such as MySpace, Facebook and so on. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Good catch, didn't fully check out the requesters source for the edit request. Made a note on the talk page. --Stickee (talk)  01:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem. It happens all the time. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit Request Question (Boomerang Latin America)
OK, but how do I do it? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.171.63.4 (talk) 01:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, please check the reply in the talk page. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  04:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, I posted the link on the article talk page. Check it out please. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.171.102.3 (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Ack.
Quite sorry. · Andonic  Contact 02:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up. · Andonic  Contact 02:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. It's not always best to rely on huggle's little slash icon when determining removal of content. Good work on keeping the vandals at bay, Stickee (talk)  02:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah no kidding. Haven't used it since it came out a couple of years ago, kinda rusty, heh. Getting the hang of it again though; I do notice there's less vandalism these days, which I find odd... · Andonic  Contact 02:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry
I'm sorry for my vandalism of the MGMT Congratulations album wikipedia page.

It won't happen again.

I just really love that album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.225.148 (talk) 02:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the apology. It is great to hear you are a great fan of their album, but Wikipedia pages are not the place to express your love for them. Thanks for your constructive edits to Wikipedia, Stickee (talk)  02:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Labshare
Please explain why seeking the speedy deletion of an article that set out solely to disparage its subject is vandalism. The Labshare article was only created today, with a complete lack of neutrality. db-attack is appropriate in this case. 86.156.221.141 (talk) 03:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello, i have already told you on my talk page that its not an attack page. -  Dwayne   was here!   &#9835;  03:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If someone (other than the page creator) disagrees with a db tag, you should use a WP:PROD or WP:AfD method of requesting deletion, where consensus can be reached. Regardless, I have removed the controversial section of the article. Thanks, Stickee (talk)  03:12, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

False attributions
I had the same problem as you can see in the page history for Talk:Labshare. Refer to Sockpuppet_investigations/ID908237835. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)