User talk:Stifle/Archive 0111

What do you have against Chicago hip hop?
I opened the article Mike Da Poet in my user space and really want to learn, how to follow Wikipedia's way of doing things, love this websight with a passion. You are not even looking into these artists credits, whats your deal? I have chose this article because it seems its been debated, but when you look at it close, this is really a very notable artist, I mean Fox News called Mike the New Eminem while closing a show for platinum selling artists Do or Die, the proof is in the pudding, plus the guys released 4 full albums and has movie credits and soundtrack credits with guys like Kanye West, help me get this correct, Please help me believe in what im doing on here, im open minded, thanks so much for all your help, look i even learned how to sign my edits. Please get Mike or Mikie or whatever his name is, his proper place on Wikipedia, it looks to me that he is someone very important in Chicago hip hop, please HELP ME, Why didnt none of my to articles even get a chance, Buk has sold millions of albums with Twista, the notables you got on the bottom of Chicago hip hop are using myspaces and all kinds of garbage, please place the real notables and take down guys that started rapping last year, your disrespecting 20 years of struggle and hard work by a whole city, please dont let your personal get involved with who's notable, take your time, read the info, be cool dude, please be a good dude and respect these guys that have opened doors in Chicago and all major cities in the world. thank you --6stargeneral (talk) 10:56, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your final warning, Mikie Da Poet or Mike Da Poet, what ever he goes by now will have a Wikipedia article, you can delete accounts forever, we are not breaking rules, your just deleting people for personal reason, why was Buks article deleted 30 seconds after Mikie, you must be a fast reader, and he sold millions of albums with Twista. So this is your Final Warning, or we, the fans from all over the world will continue to push until our hero's get there page. "One and only Warning" you sound like scareface. LOL. You have been warned. --6stargeneral (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Whitelist followup
In case you miss it, I added a followup question here. Best, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

About my motivation
I was just wondering what you meant by this comment you made: I'm happy if you're happy, although I am unsure as to the original requestor's motivation. Stifle (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

This was on MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist

You can answer whenever. I'm just a little concerned by what you mean by "motivation." I'm not doing anything wrong or illegal. --JoeMonkeyPotato (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Because you have a low edit frequency and history I am uncertain why you are requesting the page. Most spam whitelist requests that come from very new or irregular users are requests from the owner of a site or someone who stands to profit from the whitelisting. It is not anything personal, just my experience as an administrator. Stifle (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Szlachta Family Articles -- Criteria for Inclusion Usurpation of Notability
Please SEE my comments at Talk:List_of_szlachta. Would you be so kind to share your thoughts and comment there, if so inclined? Not trying to assume bad faith, nor be overly strident, but I have concerns about this in regards to topics concerning Poland, particularly the subject of Polish nobility. -- Exxess (talk) 10:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your invitation, but I do not have an opinion on this. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

eutimes.net
per MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist i tried adding the 2 links to the page and it still says the "spam filter" blocked it.(Lihaas (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)).
 * Did you add the exact same link as you requested, including the trailing / ? Stifle (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That's odd; it still doesn't work. I have no idea why that might be. ✄ (talk) 09:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Could you help with Sleep No More again?
Could you help with the Sleep No More article again? Perhaps block edits by new editor until April? From 2010-01-23T15:55:23 to 2010-01-27T01:35:38 you handled a similar problem on that page. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sleep_No_More_%282009_play%29&action=history.

Also see Talk:Sleep_No_More_%282009_play%29 Lentower (talk) 15:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The correct action is to request blocking of the editor (via WP:AIV) if he continues to blank the sections. Stifle (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It's been handled. So much to learn here. ; - } Lentower (talk) 02:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy 10th
 Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia! Hey Bzuk  (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

An old AfD you closed, related to List of First Ladies of the United States
Hi Stifle. Back in March last year you closed Articles for deletion/List of First Ladies of the United States by longevity as delete with a proviso. I think the proviso is a bit unclear as to whether "main list" means List of First Ladies of the United States or the main list on the page that was nominated. Anyway, 10 months later, nothing has happened until last week when an editor copy-pasted List of First Ladies of the United States by longevity into List of First Ladies of the United States. I reverted and opened a discussion on the talk page, but the editor readded today. Could you clarify what you meant when closing the AfD, please, so at least we know where we stand with regards to that matter, before we discuss what info, if any, should be added. Thanks, Matthewedwards : Chat  21:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant that the article should be deleted once all of its content that was not in List of First Ladies of the United States was added to that article. I am entirely unsurprised that nothing has been done about this; see user:Stifle/Delete unless cleaned up. Stifle (talk) 10:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Undeletion Request : Union Privilege
This article was deleted long ago and I want to get copy of deleted article on my userspace. I need information about it for my business requirements and I realize that this is not high priority on wikipedia. But it will be great if you can provide me with the same. Dhapli (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't find that article or any record of it ever existing. Can you please confirm the exact name; it is case-senstive and any punctuation is important too. Stifle (talk) 09:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)