User talk:Stiggynet

Stiggynet-- Re: the Crowd in Umeda(sic) picture. Thanks for the correction. -Techgeist 18:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rikai.png
Thank you for uploading File:Rikai.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 06:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RISK!


A tag has been placed on RISK! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shadowjams (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Copy paste and copyright
In regards to RISK!... the podcast might well be notable, but you cannot copy-paste from the podcast's about page to start the article.

Even if you have permission to use that copyrighted text, you need to write it from scratch, preferably in an encyclopedic manner. "Award-winning" is something you'd expect on the about page, but not in an encyclopedia. Besides, that's transparently obvious.

My suggestion would be to work on a version of the article using your userpage to develop an original article, and then use that text to create the page again. This way you can fix the formatting and work out other issues as well. Shadowjams (talk) 17:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rikaichan


The article Rikaichan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * 1. no assertion of notability 2. 4 years and only un RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox (talk) 00:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:SPAM
Please stop spamming articles with links to castig.org. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 05:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out Softlavender! It wasn't my intention to spam. I put up a few last week which I believe were helpful book notes, and my assistant today heard that and seems to have put up too many and I can see how that seems spammy. Is it possible to put back some of the earlier ones? Some should be very helpful for people looking for good book notes and commentary. For instance Letters_to_a_Young_Poet had dead links that I removed, etc. Stiggynet (talk) 05:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Since the links are not official sites or even mainstream reliable-source reviews for the books/authors and are instead quite confusing and very amateurish and WP:OR, I advise removing any remaining links. Please do not post any further ones. Thanks. Softlavender (talk) 05:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)