User talk:Stijn Calle/2008

No content in Category:Pretenders to the Bohemian throne
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Pretenders to the Bohemian throne, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Pretenders to the Bohemian throne has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Pretenders to the Bohemian throne, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maximin Giraud.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maximin Giraud.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 06:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion notice
I have nominated Category:Noblemen of Belgium for deletion because it is redundant (there is already a more complete similar category). You may want to join the discussion, as creator of this category. Fram (talk) 08:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

The House of Nassau as cadet branche of the Ottonian dynasty?
Hi Stijn,

Can you explain wat the source is for this edit? This is the first time that I see the House of Nassau mentioned as a cadet branch of the Ottonian dynasty. AFAIK the House of Nassau origins from the Counts of Laurenburg. A link between the Counts of Laurenburg and the Ottonian dynasty is unkwnown to me. Best regards, Tdevries (talk) 19:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Agribusiness Association of Solusi University
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Agribusiness Association of Solusi University, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Agribusiness Association of Solusi University. Edcolins (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Carlist Pretenders since 1833
A tag has been placed on Template:Carlist Pretenders since 1833 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Too many cats...
You've once again overcategorized things in Category:Freemasonry, and you're doing it by putting things into categories they do not belong in. Please do not categorize things into Freemasonry anymore, as I'm tired of cleaning up afterwards. Last time, when you did "Freemasons by nationality", everything was mass-CfDed. MSJapan (talk) 07:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Masonic culture
Category:Masonic culture, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 07:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Split
But this article does not give information on differences between 'church' in christian and non-christian denominations... have you looked at it? --Carlaude (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:Counts of Mantane
A tag has been placed on Category:Counts of Mantane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is an unpopulated category. The category contained just Count of Mantane, since deleted - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count of Mantane. According to that, it is doubtful that the title ever existed

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jll (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)