User talk:StillThinking

Geobytes
The article as it stands is not encyclopedic.

The 30+ links to Geobytes that you refer don't originate from the main namespace ... these are User talk pages and the like.

Problem areas:
 * zero wikification
 * external links embedded in the article (e.g., the flash demo)
 * too many unrelated external links
 * descriptive adjectives that imply bias (i.e., not neutral); qualifiers as if to make up for the lack of citations, e.g.,
 * "one of the oldest companies in the geolocation market"
 * "one of the first companies (if not the first)"

Here's what I recommend you do:


 * history - trim it down
 * technology overview - trim it down to 10 sentences
 * competitors - one sentence

Then let's see if the article can stand on its own and satisfy notability requirements of WP:CORP.

BTW please sign your comments in future. -- Robocoder ( t|c ) 04:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)