User talk:Stirner61

Welcome!
Hello, Stirner61, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Innovation economics did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Possibly (talk) 17:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello! Here is an example of what we call original research: "Classical and Schumpeterian analyses dealt explicitly with innovation by referring to market incentives, the role of banks in lending money to finance innovations, the endogenous forces which stimulate firms to innovate, the type of firms which innovate more (the last few words refer to the debate on "market structure and innovation", roughly synthesised through the phrases Schumpeter Mark I - new 'small' firms in competitive markets are the most innovative - and Schumpeter Mark II - big oligopolistic firms innovate more).


 * A different vein which considers technical change looks at economic growth from a macroeconomic perspective, where one observes that innovation enters the economy through capital accumulation and investments, and thus one finds many contributions from the 1930s onwards which sees as protagonists Roy Harrod, Joan Robinson, Evsey Domar, Michał Kalecki, Nicholas Kaldor, Luigi Pasinetti and more. Strictly speaking, however, these scholars do not study innovativeness per se, but look at the macroeconomic economic expansion (or cycles), taking into account macroeconomic compatibilities (e.g. savings = investments) and, sometimes, the effect on total employment."


 * We do not accept original research on Wikipedia. Possibly (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)